Editorial Note: This article is written with editorial review and topic relevance in mind.
Rdflib seems to support parsing rdfa data. I have a quick question about rdfa and microdata. Microdata was a response to rdfa, but with a different data model (roughly.
Snrha Rentcafe Portal
Vocabularies you can use to mark up your data. Rdfa is really good, but it's complex and not that obvious to most. My current understanding is that rdfa is rdf implemented into html but is complicated for new developers like myself,.
Dublin core and foaf are schemas, i.e.
I understand that every uri should represent a ressource. Microdata is clear, well defined and backed by google, hence my recommendation to use that. Keep using xhtml 1.1 and rdfa 1.0, and use the. I am a bit confused about the semantics of websites.
It provides a set of attributes to augment the visual. I assume that all information provided by rdfa inside a. Rdfa is an attempt to get both the flexibility of rdf and the simplicity of microformats. This will have to wait.
Owl (and rdfs) are languages for writing new schemas / vocabularies /.
Rdfa (resource description framework in attributes) is a technique that allows to express structured data in markup languages. The vocab attribute is defined in rdfa 1.1, but with your current doctype, you are using rdfa 1.0.
